More magnificent comic strips with more Magnificent Marauders!
And don’t forget:
More magnificent comic strips with more Magnificent Marauders!
And don’t forget:
This one ends the episode – but there are so many more!
And, in case you were not aware, you can follow us on twitter @comicblvd and join our facebook group to meet other Comic Boulevard enthusiasts (like my Mom!) facebook.com/ComicBoulevard
#RememberWhenParade keeps chugging along – except this time with the final Deconstruction article! Going forward, after the comics are all paraded out, we will be getting some new Deconstructions uploaded! Stay peeled, friends!
Hello internet! Welcome back to another episode of Deconstructing Comics. Let’s get to it!
When I made Narrative storytelling one of the three major “buckets” or “piles” of deconstruction I understood that it was a very broad term that contained a variety of different elements within it. It is an entire field to itself with its own tools and science all within the greater umbrella of creative production. My last couple of articles focused on the other two categories of deconstruction in their general terms, but for this one I am going to zoom in a little bit closer. I am going to focus on specific elements of the Narrative category and examine their function and position and action within comic book mechanics. I will separate and present each of those elements individually, looking for things like characterization, themes, tone, or stuff like gathering cohesive plot points, context, dialogue ripples etc. The focus for this month’s article is Character.
Characters are one of, if not the main draw to comic books. We read stories about Superman because he is awesome and we want to watch him perform super heroic acts. A lot of comics succeed and endure solely because of their characters, rather than their plots or thematic messages. If you were to read a comic book with the intent to distill the character parts what would you be looking for? How would you read that book? That is the thesis of this article. That is the cut of a comic that we are going to cook today.
Primarily, this episode applies to main characters, not the supporting cast, because a comic only has so many pages to express itself and it will budget more for a main character than a secondary one; therefore, there will be much more meat to chew on in a deconstruction. That is not to say you cannot distill a supporting character from a comic, only that if you do you will have less in your cup to drink than if you distilled the sweet nectar of a main character.
To demonstrate my argument I chose The Watchmen, specifically the character of Rorschach.
Distilling Rorschach from The Watchmen
To distill a character from a comic you have to conduct multiple readings in order to penetrate the baked layers of a work. I don’t mean read the book multiple times in a row. What I mean is to read the book for different purposes. In your head you detect each element and interpret their meanings dynamically. Take every scene, every piece of dialogue, every movement and action and tediously scan it bit by bit looking to see if it relates to, or speaks to, the purposes you are reading the book for. Basically, we are asking a series of questions to define the character. You can do this all in one go. In our case, we are reading The Watchmen to see Rorschach.
In a first “reading” of The Watchmen (remember, I don’t mean reading as in cover to cover, I mean how you comprehend the work) we ask who is he and what does he do? We then sift through the plot and illustrations to find a broad sketch of Rorschach. These things are presented on the surface as a foundation for the character, his personality and his position as a hero in the comic book. We construct an impression of the character.
We find his two defining character features to be an uncompromising morality and a reputation for violence. If you were to define Rorschach, those are the first two things you would say: he does not compromise and he is violent. We learned these things by his words and his deeds. What does he say and what does he do. Ok, that is level one Rorschach, a distilled self-contained sketch of the character. But there is a greater meaning to him and a depth beneath the surface. How do we get at that?
In a second reading you would look closer at how he behaves; do his deeds match his words? How does he describe himself? How do his friends and allies and enemies regard him? How does society describe him? How does he react to opposing values? How does he handle success, defeat? This is different than a level one reading because at first you would only ask a couple of question and then be on your way. Here you look for greater meaning and greater context. We learn how he fits into the world and the group he acts with. We learn what the people think of him and how he feels about that. The purpose of the second reading is to create a three dimensional biography. The main point of the second reading is to ask “what if this character was real?” A real person is not solely their words and their actions. They are emotions and relationships and decisions and mistakes and energy levels and social statuses and etc.
These are the things a comic creator has to take into account for each of their main characters because these are the ways in which a character will bloom in a work. If they are solely level one then they are one dimensional (as in, here is what they look like and here is their actions in this scene). A character with multiple dimensions has a backstory, has relationships, has positive and negative memories both within their self and with others (an old friend could criticize them, or they could reflect on a past mistake in context of a current decision etc.) This is exactly what we find with Rorschach.
In The Watchmen, we read that Rorschach is a renegade vigilante disobeying the law of the land but adhering to a very strict moral principle. He is terrifying and confusing for the average person in that world (if we lived in the city this is what we would believe about Rorschach too.) We learn about Rorschach not just from watching him investigate the Comedian’s murder, but how other people speak about him. We hear from others about his response to the Keene Act. We gain insight into his personality and his past through the effort of his prison therapist, how the man becomes disturbed and emotionally soured by interacting with Rorschach. A character is not just who they are and what they do, they are how they interact with others, how they affect others, how others affect them and regard them. Rorschach’s determination affects Nite Owl and the Silk Spectre back into their old hobby of vigilantism. A character’s backstory falls into the second layer of reading as well because it offers reasons for being, purpose. Why is Rorschach a vigilante? Why is Rorschach non-compromising? Why is Rorschach violent? These questions are answered in the bulk of the second level of a character. We read further into the character to create them as a real person.
This brings us to the third reading of character deconstruction. In the third layer, you would ask what the authors use the character for. You would ask why does he exist? What does he mean? What does he symbolize, represent? We interpret the character.
The Watchmen is a great work for this kind of reading because it contains a wealth of ideas and questions and scenarios. We have a world on the brink of nuclear war, an emotionally detached demigod (maybe even deity?) and a swelling tide of criminal and gang activity. Of all this, we have a group of people who believe they are trying to save the world by reprising their profession as vigilantes. As far as characterization, it runs the spectrum of super-human to broken defeated human – from Dr. Manhattan to Nite Owl.
This would be a great opportunity to get into a discussion on the meaning of The Watchmen, to debate what the finale means (the grotesque alien monster that is Veidt’s answer to the Gordian knot of geopolitics) and what the creators intended. I would love to do that. However, that is not the focus of this article and so I am going to strictly argue about the meaning of the character of Rorschach.
We, the reading audience, learned before that Rorschach is uncompromising and violent, but does he still uphold that when he learns his teammates collude with their morally twisted-yet-convincing opponent? Yes he does. And so, at his core he is, really, the only true hero of the whole work (based on his response to the finale of the comic). The main characters of The Watchmen claim to be heroes but we find them flawed and flagging. The comic presents him as a psychotic murderer, hated by the police and population, socially distant from his own hero group – yet Rorschach is the only one who maintains his virtue. He is the only one who put his money where his mouth is to give his life for the cause.
Rorschach is an emotionally flawed and psychologically demented character who cares the most about humanity and proves to be the most heroic. That sounds like a contradiction. Maybe that’s the joke? I believe that Moore and Gibbons intended Rorschach to be a paladin-type character in a world of stupidity and apathy. It is his actions and deeds that will ultimately reveal the hoax perpetrated by Veidt and the Watchmen team. Rorschach, despite his traumatic youth, despite his ostracization and persecution at the hands of the police, despite the fact that most people are terrified of him, is the only one who truly does the right thing. He is the only one who opposes the villainy of his ex-teammate Ozymandias and who pays for it with his life. Rorschach, for all his paranoia and murder, proves to be the solitary, stalwart defender of humanity.
I argue that Moore means to say that a person can claim to be heroic (in the case of the vigilantes), a person can even have godlike powers (in the case of Dr. Manhattan) but ultimately it is the act of upholding and defending your principles – even at the point of ridicule or death – that makes the person a true hero. You could say, ‘duh, everyone knows the definition of a hero,’ but just look at the other characters and how they behaved. Look at Rorschach in comparison to those other characters. The other “heroes” felt embarrassed, guilty about their role, some abused their power (The Comedian), others could care less about the dangers or the conspiracy poised (Dr. Manhattan) but none possessed the purity of cause or the clarity of purpose that Rorschach had.
For a third level reading, then, we learn that the creators used the character of Rorschach to express a point about heroism, morality and making choices about your principles and values. The Watchmen is a super-hero comic book with only one hero: Rorschach. His drive to solve the murder of the Comedian, his actions and his sacrifice offer a greater meaning to the whole of the work than the visual elements or the craft.
If Rorschach was a slice of The Watchmen birthday cake here are the layers you would find: top layer) he is a noncompromising violent maniac, mid layer) he is regarded as a maniac and a criminal to society and the government, his friends semi-trust him but think he is an extremist, bottom layer) the creators intend him to mean that although being morally staunch is extremely difficult and often opposite to what society demands, doing so is the true virtue and the ultimate heroism.
If you liked Brass Knuckle then you’re going to love this miniseries! Hostile Forces Unknown was the original seed for Brass Knuckle, released way back in 2013 on Comic Boulevard.
Strip 8 is the famous introduction of Captain Kaptan – one part Batman, one part Inspector Clouseau, all parts goof.
Follow us @comicblvd and facebook.com/comicboulevard
Good news friends, the Groundhog came out of its hole and saw its shadow! That means it wants to read more comics 😉 Fortunately, here’s more Kid With a Cape:
#RememberWhenParade continues marching on, so don’t forget to follow this site on twitter @comicblvd and join the Facebook group /ComicBoulevard to keep up 🙂
#RememberWhenParade marches on with the next strip of The Magnificent Marauders! Follow us @comicblvd and facebook.com/ComicBoulevard
#RememberWhenParade continues this month with an article published one year ago! This is almost like time-travel…except not at all.
Don’t forget to follow us @comicblvd and join our Facebook group: /comicboulevard.
Happy New Year! I hope that you had a marvelous holiday and you are ready to get back to comic-booking. Let’s continue our examination of the deconstruction categories with this next topic, “Comic Craftwork.” This month, I chose Silver Surfer #11 by Dan Slott and the Allreds, Michael and Laura.
The focus of this month’s issue is on comic book craftwork. I believe this issue of Silver Surfer is one of the best demonstrations of high skill craftwork in contemporary comics. It not only presents a wildly new and exciting way of manipulating the medium, but it tells a wonderful story at the same time.
In the previous article I wrote about the visual storytelling of All Star Superman. Comparing the focus of that article with the image below and you will see why I am arguing a difference. Comic books routinely use illustrations as story components (as we learned in the December Edition). Here, in Silver Surfer #11, the team employed the entire book to move the plot and to convey its themes, emotional and dramatic. I don’t want to reveal too many images of the comic and spoil the effect so I will briefly describe what is happening here and how they are using it.
In the story, Silver Surfer and the alien refugees are trapped in a time loop. The comic book is split in half horizontally and then vertically in the middle. At the beginning, the top stream begins the story and explains the predicament the travellers find themselves. As you follow along when you get to the middle split (the vertical trap) you will rotate the book and follow the bottom stream which has now become the top stream. The direction sends you back to the beginning page of the comic. If you are not careful, this will continuously loop you through the first half of the comic (which is deliberate). Eventually you make the leap and “turn the page” to find the right path. This then breaks out to the conclusion of the comic in ordinary page by page.
The reoccurring argument of my ‘Deconstructing Comics’ series is why one thing is considered visual and the other considered craftwork? SS#11 proves the difference. The above image is an example of why I categorize this as craft over visual. In All Star Superman we saw how the illustrations of a panel tell a second story amidst the main plot of a work. Craftwork, if wielded with skill and forethought, can tell a “third story.”
Just as the characters are trapped in a worm hole time loop, by designing the comic book in this way the team is trapping the audience in with the characters. It is a way to make the reader feel what it is like to be stuck repeating actions and conversations indefinitely and, ultimately, to feel what it is like to liberate oneself from the repetition. The design of the book is embedded with clues and direction for the audience to follow so that the solution is not entirely impossible to find. If you notice, each panel is designed like a signpost to direct traffic along the page. There are subtle arrows drawn into the panel ends so the audience’s eye follows along seamlessly. Be wary of betrayal because the arrows manipulate you into the warp loop. Should the reader not take a moment to solve the problem they would probably miss the ending stream of the book and feel frustrated or cheated. That is the exact same feeling Silver Surfer expresses as he senses the motions of the loop. Just as the audience is trapped in figuring out how to puzzle their way out of the rotation, so is Silver Surfer. The mechanics of this comic demand the participation and interaction of the reader to solve the puzzle. This creates empathy with the characters as they too are stuck in the loop and trying to find their way out. The craft of this book conjoins those two emotions perfectly. It expresses the story of Silver Surfer and his friends struggling to find a sanctuary while at the same time expressing the story of the helpless reader trying to solve the puzzle of reading this comic book.
It can be difficult and risky to attempt something like this in the medium which is why we see it infrequently. It takes practice and planning to use the medium itself (rather than just its narrative and visual elements) to express a story for the audience. That extra element elevates the work and enhances its effect. This effort is something that can only be done by using the craft of the medium in addition to the visual and narrative aspects.
In All Star Superman we saw how the illustrations told a story of their own additional to the narrative. In Silver Surfer #11 we see how the page of the work tells its own story in addition to the illustrations and in addition to the narrative. Craftwork is a third and very integral element to comic books.
More comedy, more zanity, more Kid with a Cape!
Follow Comic Boulevard @comicblvd for release news and join our Facebook group facebook/comicboulevard